It follows the form of the mathematical set-builder notation. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and generate link and share the link here. rev 2021.1.18.38333, Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Programming & related technical career opportunities, Recruit tech talent & build your employer brand, Reach developers & technologists worldwide, Note that PyLint warns if you use map instead of list comprehension, see. But you could always indent your code. comprehensions - python map vs list comprehension . There is no alternate for it in map Python - List Comprehension Previous Next List Comprehension. acknowledge that you have read and understood our, GATE CS Original Papers and Official Keys, ISRO CS Original Papers and Official Keys, ISRO CS Syllabus for Scientist/Engineer Exam, Python | Check if two lists are identical, Python | Check if all elements in a list are identical, Python | Check if all elements in a List are same, Intersection of two arrays in Python ( Lambda expression and filter function ), G-Fact 19 (Logical and Bitwise Not Operators on Boolean), Adding new column to existing DataFrame in Pandas, Samsung R&D Bangalore Interview Experience | Lateral hire (6 month experience), Modak Analytics B.tech Interview Experience, Python program to convert a list to string, How to get column names in Pandas dataframe, Reading and Writing to text files in Python, Different ways to create Pandas Dataframe, isupper(), islower(), lower(), upper() in Python and their applications, Write Interview The major advantage of using computer programs to solve a problem is that we have more than one way to solve a particular problem. This video is unavailable. List comprehension is faster than map when we need to evaluate expressions that are too long or complicated to express. @Alex: I prefer not to introduce unnecessary names, like, I think that @GreggLind has a point, with his, "the very useful itertools module [is] probably considered unpythonic in terms of style". Python List Comprehension | Segregate 0's and 1's in an array list, Move all zeroes to end of array using List Comprehension in Python, Python List Comprehension to find pair with given sum from two arrays, Python List Comprehension | Sort even-placed elements in increasing and odd-placed in decreasing order, Python List Comprehension | Three way partitioning of an array around a given range, Difference between List comprehension and Lambda in Python, Python | List comprehension vs * operator. List comprehensions provide a concise way to create lists. But from personal experience (and from seeing others make the same mistake) I've seen it happen enough times that I think it's not worth the pain you have to go through when these bugs creep into your code. In this tutorial, we’ll discuss what is Python list comprehension and how to use it? It provide a concise way to create lists. There is dis to show Python Bytecode of Python code. @wim: This was only about Python 2, although it applies to Python 3 if you want to stay backwards-compatible. I'm sorry but you wrote this in late 2012, well after python 3 is on the scene, and the answer reads like you're recommending an otherwise unpopular style of python coding just because you got bitten by a bug while cutting-and-pasting code. One of the language’s most distinctive features is the list comprehension, which you can use to create powerful functionality within a single line of code.However, many developers struggle to fully leverage the more advanced features of a list comprehension in Python. List comprehension offers a shorter syntax when you want to create a new list based on the values of an existing list. I consider that the most Pythonic way is to use a list comprehension instead of map and filter. Of course, abusing language features is always a difficult temptation to resist. Use map and filter. site design / logo © 2021 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. Along with this, we will learn syntax, list comprehension vs lambda expression in Python3. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. If you're so bright and/or experienced that this isn't a problem for you then I'm happy for you, I don't think most people are like you. I've seen others who are smarter than me fall into the same trap. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. Actually, map and list comprehensions behave quite differently in the Python 3 language. The __slots__ attribute is a simple optimization in Python to define the total memory needed by the class (attributes), reducing memory size. Python 3.5 Why is map() slower than list comprehension? Here, I looked at the following methods: I looked at lists (stored in the variable vals) of both integers (Python int) and floating point numbers (Python float) for increasing list sizes. The map call is similar to the list comprehension expression. Then by passing the appropriate map function to the rest of your code, you may not have to modify your original serial code to have it run in parallel (etc). Usually this will usually outweigh any overhead from using map. It is important to realize that these tests assume a very simple function (the identity function); however this is fine because if the function were complicated, then performance overhead would be negligible compared to other factors in the program. List comprehensions are non-lazy, so may require more memory (unless you use generator comprehensions). Hmm. funcname: It is the name of the function which is already defined and is to be executed for each item. map may be microscopically faster in some cases (when you're NOT making a lambda for the purpose, but using the same function in map and a listcomp). I am guessing the zip() is an unfortunate and unnecessary overhead you need to indulge in if you insist on using list comprehensions instead of the map. Python supports the following 4 types of comprehensions: List Comprehensions; Dictionary Comprehensions; Set Comprehensions; Generator Comprehensions; List Comprehensions: List Comprehensions … The reason is that list comprehensions are clearer than map and filter. In many cases, “for loops” will be your only choice. Image by StartupStockPhotos from Pixabay The major advantage of using computer programs to solve a problem is that we have more than one way to solve a particular problem. Furthermore, a comprehension also allows filtering easily, while map requires filter to allow filtering. But which option is faster? Of course, "[op1*op2 from op1,op2 in zip(list1,list2)]" | s/form/for/ And an equivalent list with out zip: (less readable)[list1[i]*list2[i] for i in range(len(list1))]. List comprehension is more concise and easier to read as compared to map. Previously, we discussed Lists in Python. why not always use map if its faster than the rest (list comprehension, loop (various variants))? However let's say that we have a pre-made function f we'd like to map, and we ignore the laziness of map by immediately forcing evaluation with list(...). We have seen that list comprehensions can be a good alternative to for loops because they are more compact and faster. have to go through all our code and change stuff like maps to ugly looking list comprehensions or whatever when Python 3000 comes out. @wim: Huh? Python is famous for allowing you to write code that’s elegant, easy to write, and almost as easy to read as plain English. An objective reason why you should prefer them even though they're not "Pythonic" is this: Do the benefits of the Slasher Feat work against swarms? Here are the resulting plots. List comprehension allows filtering. ?, and B and C were performed with a circa-2013 AMD workstation with python 3.2.1, with extremely different hardware. The first time you look at squares it seems to behave as a sequence of three elements, but the second time as an empty one. Introduction. It was only after I moved the inner block to a different section of the code that the problem came up (read: problem during maintenance, not development), and I didn't expect it. And for the record, you clearly didn't read the answer because I said in, It is still not a logical reason for switching to. The square brackets [...] often make things obvious, especially when in a mess of parentheses. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. I think you are using Python 3.x When I asked this question Python 3 had only recently been released and Python 2.x was very much the standard. They seem to do the same functionality. I never claimed to be bright or experienced, I just don't agree that the bold claim is justified by your reasons. Understanding a proof of the uniqueness lemma for bases, Decoupling Capacitor Loop Length vs Loop Area. List comprehensions are a concise notation borrowed from the functional programming language Haskell. That is fine in theory, but in practice I'm going to have to use Nevertheless, python does support lazy list comprehensions in the form of generator expressions, as follows: You can basically think of the [...] syntax as passing in a generator expression to the list constructor, like list(x for x in range(5)). For example, the, > guido . The process of finding the best logical solution among others makes the … ), edit Map is faster in case of calling an already defined function (as no lambda is required). I tried the code by @alex-martelli but found some discrepancies. "Get used to cold weather" or "get used to the cold weather"? If no results are required, using a simple loop is simpler to read and faster to run. Some other ones... operator.attrgetter, operator.itemgetter, etc. In the Python 2 language map returns a plain old list, just like list comprehensions do in both languages. I find list comprehensions are generally more expressive of what I'm trying to do than map - they both get it done, but the former saves the mental load of trying to understand what could be a complex lambda expression. Answers: map may be microscopically faster in some cases (when you’re NOT making a lambda for the purpose, but using … If I am blending parsley for soup, can I use the parsley whole or should I still remove the stems? (It may still be interesting to test with other simple things like f=lambda x:x+x). Lists are more predictable since they only change when you explicitly mutate them; they are, And a bonus: numbers, strings, and tuples are even more predictable since they cannot change at all; they are. why is user 'nobody' listed as a user on my iMAC? Writing code in comment? Nevertheless, map and filter and similar functions (like the very useful itertools module) are probably considered unpythonic in terms of style. Python 3.5.2 and CPythonI've used Jupiter notebook and especially %timeit built-in magic command But I can't see a way to do this in a list comprehension: [2, 4, 8, 16] Is there a … List comprehension allows filtering. Strengthen your foundations with the Python Programming Foundation Course and learn the basics. I could favorite this answer if there was a way. Wenn Sie bereits Erfahrung mit Python oder anderen Programmiersprachen haben, könnte der Python-Kurs für Fortgeschritteneder geeignete Kurs sein. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. List comprehension are used when a list of results is required as map only returns a map object and does not return any list. Sure some of you will say you don't have to update, just stick with Python 2.3/2.4 or whatever. Python's multiprocessing module does this: Yeah, sigh, but Guido's original intention to remove lambda altogether in Python 3 got a barrage of lobbying against it, so he went back on it despite my stout support -- ah well, guess lambda's just too handy in many. iterables: It can be list, tuples or any other iterable object. The map(), filter() and reduce() functions bring a bit of functional programming to Python. All makes sense, and I was unaware that, This is a very old question, and the answer you are referring to was very likely written in reference to Python 2, where. brightness_4 Is it better complexity wise to use the map() function in python or a comprehension? In this case, the list comprehension (map_comprehension technique) is fastest for both types of additions in an object, especially with shorter lists. code. close, link @lumbric, I'm not sure but it does only if lambda is used in map. Let's see the bytecode of list comprehension and mapto compare the performance. Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! Is there a reason to prefer using map() over list comprehension or vice versa? Plotting polygons as separate plots using Python, Better user experience while having low content to show. github.com/uqfoundation/pathos/blob/master/tests/test_map.py, github.com/uqfoundation/pathos/blob/master/tests/test_star.py, docs.python.org/2/library/multiprocessing.html, Podcast 305: What does it mean to be a “senior” software engineer. First of all, test like this: Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career. I wasn't. Create a dictionary with list comprehension, map function for objects (instead of arrays). For example, to print all even numbers in range of 100, we can write [n for n in range(100) if n%2 == 0]. I thought I had discovered a new syntactical approach to list comprehensions... Darn. Adding scripts to Processing toolbox via PyQGIS. It returns a map object containing the results. You can see for yourself which is better between - List Comprehension and the Map Function, (List Comprehension takes lesser time to process 1 million records when compared to a map function). using sequences which have been already defined. Python List Comprehension Vs. Map . Both ways lead to the same result, thus the output is True. The code was fine originally -- the two xs weren't in the same scope. 9 min read. Wenn Sie Python schnell und effizient lernen wollen, empfehlen wir den Kurs Einführung in Python von Bodenseo. map takes the same amount of time even for very large ranges while using list comprehension takes a lot of time as is evident from my code. Python 2 is still used in a lot of places, the fact that Python 3 exists doesn't change that. Let us take a simple operation to print number in a given range. Is either of them generally more efficient or considered generally more pythonic than the other? (6 replies) I read somewhere that the function 'map' might one day be deprecated in favor of list comprehensions. Dieser Kurs wendet sich an totale Anfänger, was Programmierung betrifft. The following dummy class DummyNum is considered: Specifically, the add method. Well explained. I'm not seeing 'tightly coupled code' as one of the drawbacks of a monolithic application architecture. How to make a flat list out of list of lists? Posted by: admin October 29, 2017 Leave a comment. map vs. list-comprehension. The interview you are thinking about is this one: @Alex, I don't have your years of experience, but I've seen far more over-complicated list comprehensions than lambdas. In terms of efficiency, like most functional programming constructs, MAP CAN BE LAZY, and in fact is lazy in python. But map applies a function call to each item instead of an arbitrary expression. You can often hear that list comprehension is “more Pythonic” (almost as if there was a … Note: For more information, refer to Python List Comprehension and Slicing. Attention geek! List comprehensions may be faster in other cases and most (not all) pythonistas consider them more direct and clearer. Don't forget to consider using imap and ifilter (in itertools) if they are appropriate for your situation! I'll also point out that "hobbled" isn't always a bad thing. Loop vs List Comprehension vs Map in Python | by Felix Antony | Nov, 2020. Comprehensions in Python provide us with a short and concise way to construct new sequences (such as lists, set, dictionary etc.) And when you say "it's not exactly a subtle bug for anyone that has used Python more than a few months" that sentence literally means "this only concerns inexperienced developers" (clearly not you). Map, Filter, Lambda, and List Comprehensions in Python¶ Author: R.G. How to describe a cloak touching the ground behind you as you walk? This is also a good general reminder to keep functions (and thus scope) small and have thorough unit tests and use assert statements. Great question! Map VS List Comprehension. Because of this limitation, it is somewhat less general tool. Take a look at the following Python 3 program: You might expect it to print the line "[1, 4, 9]" twice, but instead it prints "[1, 4, 9]" followed by "[]". Note: For more information, refer to Python map() function. They require functions/lambdas as arguments, which introduce a new scope. The time difference, in this case, is negligible and is a matter of the function in question (see @Alex Martelli's response). Watch Queue Queue This is where map() function plays its role ! Lambda Functions. Watch Queue Queue. Return Type: Returns a map object after applying the given function to each item of a given iterable (list, tuple etc. I will present you some time comparisons. The elements are consumed when you iterate over an iterator unlike when you iterate over a list. What does the ^ character mean in sequences like ^X^I? Therefore if you will not be using all your data, or do not know ahead of time how much data you need, map in python3 (and generator expressions in python2 or python3) will avoid calculating their values until the last moment necessary. Note : We will be using an in-built python library ‘timeit‘. That means you can do this (in python3) and your computer will not run out of memory and lose all your unsaved data: Try doing that with a list comprehension: Do note that list comprehensions are also inherently lazy, but python has chosen to implement them as non-lazy. The respective items passed as a parameter to the map function present in the list. From the above code, we can observe that map still works better than list comprehension. It loads list comprehension, creates function, loads range function and loads 100 to give it as argument, calls range function, and returns the value. On the other hand, sometimes you end up being verbose like typing [x for x in.... As long as you keep your iterator variables short, list comprehensions are usually clearer if you don't indent your code. As @AlexMartelli already mentioned, map() is faster than list comprehension only if you don't use lambda function. The crux is that the return value of map in Python 3 (and imap in Python 2) is not a list - it's an iterator! Is either of them generally more efficient or considered generally more pythonic than the other? Additional variables that stand for items within the iterable are constructed around a for clause. If they were, there wouldn't be such an urge to fix it in Python 3. Last Updated: December 2, 2020. So apart from being considered "unpythonic", I have not faced any performance issues relating to usage of map. In my opinion, Python Bytecode is underst… Last Updated : 12 Jan, 2021; Python is renowned for encouraging developers and programmers to write efficient, easy-to-understand, and almost as simple-to-read code. Note: There are cases when list comprehension can perform better than map where expressions are too long and complex. Yes, if you never make this mistake then list comprehensions are more elegant. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. I made a 17 minute tutorial on list comp vs map if anyone finds it useful -. Should be "for" not "from" in your second code quote, @andz, and in @weakish's comment too. Python tutorial on the difference between the map() function and list comprehensions. As stated previously, the technique used makes a minimal difference and you should code in a way that is most readable to you, or in the particular circumstance. 29 Jun 2005 10:04:40 GMT skrev F. Petitjean: Le Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:46:15 +0000 (UTC), Mandus a écrit : For example, to print all even numbers in range of 100, we can write. Why would a land animal need to move continuously to stay alive? It's interesting that list comprehensions (empirically) seem more prone to abuse than lambdas, though I'm not sure why that should be the case. Not to kibash on Alex's infinite style points, but sometimes map seems easier to read to me: data = map(str, some_list_of_objects). Suppose we have a function and we want to compute this function for different values in a single line of code . Count set bits using Python List comprehension, K’th Non-repeating Character in Python using List Comprehension and OrderedDict, List comprehension and ord() in Python to remove all characters other than alphabets, Python | Convert list of string to list of list, Python | Convert list of tuples to list of list, Python | Convert List of String List to String List, Python | Plotting Google Map using gmplot package, Python script to open a Google Map location on clipboard, Map function and Lambda expression in Python to replace characters, Map function and Dictionary in Python to sum ASCII values, Python map function to find row with maximum number of 1's, Python map function | Count total set bits in all numbers from 1 to n, Data Structures and Algorithms – Self Paced Course, Ad-Free Experience – GeeksforGeeks Premium, We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. @GZ0 thanks for the great feedback! @semiomant I would say lazy map (like in python3) is more 'functional' than eager map (like in python2). Visit this pastebin for the source used to generate the plot and data. Can anti-radiation missiles be used to target stealth fighter aircraft? Thanks for pointing this out. The only thing we can tell seems to be that, oddly, while we expect list comprehensions [...] to perform better than generator expressions (...), map is ALSO more efficient that generator expressions (again assuming that all values are evaluated/used). In map, we have no such facility. List Comprehension in Python- The list comprehension is a replacement of for loop. this is probably the best argument for list comprehensions. Either you can use map (function, list) and convert the resulting map object to a list or you iterate over each item with a list comprehension. Many simple “for loops” in Python can be replaced with list comprehensions. We can think of them like a syntactic sugar for the filter and map functions. So i thought it would be useful to add it to comparison, Use list comprehension if it's custom function, use list(map()) if there is builtin function. Example: Based on a list of fruits, you want a new list, containing only the fruits with the letter "a" in the name. So since Python 3, map() is an iterator, you need to keep in mind what do you need: an iterator or list object. To begin with, your interview preparations Enhance your Data Structures concepts with the Python DS Course. If you're skilled at reading python assembly, you can use the dis module to see if that's actually what's going on behind the scenes: It seems it is better to use [...] syntax than list(...). For example, map in Haskell is lazy (well, everything in Haskell is lazy...). How to handle a Python Exception in a List Comprehension? In map, we have no such facility. It loads map function, it loads the lambda (lambda n: n), makes the lambda function object, loads range function and loads 100 to give it as argument, calls two functions and returns the value. List Comprehension vs For Loop in Python. It consists of brackets containing an expression followed by a for clause, then zero or more for or if clauses. Sadly the map class is a bit opaque to disassembly, but we can make due with our speed test. Erdmann: map(), filter(), lambda, and list comprehensions provide compact, elegant, and efficient ways to encode a few common idioms in programming. I hadn't realized that map could take several iterables as inputs for its function and could thus avoid a zip. pythons map is not the functional map but the crippled red-headed stepchild of a functional implementation. We perform this operation using both map and list comprehension one by one. In some cases, however, map may be faster to run than a list comprehension such as when mapping a built-in function. Please use ide.geeksforgeeks.org, If you require a list of results almost always use a list comprehension. I ran a quick test comparing three methods for invoking the method of an object. Python map() function; Taking input in Python; Iterate over a list in Python; Enumerate() in Python; Python – List Comprehension . Is this simplified version of map/lambda in python? In this Python Programming video tutorial you will learn about List comprehension in detail with example. This is why squares looks empty in the last print(list(squares)) line. Can Pluto be seen with the naked eye from Neptune when Pluto and Neptune are closest? As you an see, a comprehension does not require extra lambda expressions as map needs. And map requires less coding. List Comprehensions vs map and filter. They prevent subtle hard-to-diagnose scope-related bugs. In Python, list comprehensions are constructed like so: list_variable = [x for x in iterable] A list, or other iterable, is assigned to a variable. There's also an interview out there somewhere (I can't find it offhand) where Guido lists lambdas and the functional functions as the thing he most regrets about accepting into Python, so you could make the argument that they're un-Pythonic by virtue of that. The process of finding the best logical solution among others makes the programmer stand out in the crowd. How do I concatenate two lists in Python? And they have limitations - you can’t break out of a list comprehension or put comments inside. Would be great if someone clarifies this whether affirmatively or negatively. Questions: Is there a reason to prefer using map() over list comprehension or vice versa? You want to say map returns an iterable, not an iterator. Would a vampire still be able to be a practicing Muslim? List Comprehension vs map() in Python: How is a list comprehension different from the map() function? An example of the tiny speed advantage of map when using exactly the same function: An example of how performance comparison gets completely reversed when map needs a lambda: I dislike the word "pythonic" because I don't find that pythonic is always elegant in my eyes. List Comprehensions in Python. The result seems to be that map and list comprehensions are comparable in performance, which is most strongly affected by other random factors. Anyway, lazy map is better for chaining maps - if you have a map applied to map applied to map, you have a list for each of intermediate map calls in python2, whereas in python3 you have just one resulting list, so its more memory efficient. What is the simplest proof that the density of primes goes to zero? Measurements: s == 1000 ms == 1000 * 1000 µs = 1000 * 1000 * 1000 ns, There is also such thing as generator expression, see PEP-0289. All three of these are convenience functions that can be replaced with List Comprehensions or loops, but provide a more elegant and short-hand approach to some problems.. Before continuing, we'll go over a few things you should be familiar with before reading about the aforementioned methods: Concept of iteration is an important … 8x8 square with no adjacent numbers summing to a prime. I don't like the term "Pythonic" either, so in some sense I don't care what it means, but I don't think it's fair to those who do use it, to say that according to "Pythonicness" builtins, @ShadowRanger: true, but was GvR ever planning to remove. Suppose, we want to separate the letters of the word human and add the letters as items of a list. List Comprehension is a substitute for the lambda function, map(), filter() and reduce(). I've gotten bitten by this more than once: You could say I was being silly for using the same variable name in the same scope. If you plan on writing any asynchronous, parallel, or distributed code, you will probably prefer map over a list comprehension -- as most asynchronous, parallel, or distributed packages provide a map function to overload python's map. your coworkers to find and share information. With that said, I think some of the other answers make it clear that list comprehension should be the default approach most of the time but that this is something to remember. Simplest proof that the function 'map ' might one day be deprecated in favor of list comprehensions provide concise. Not the functional programming to Python map ( ) and reduce ( ) in Python no. More than one way to solve a problem is that list comprehensions are more elegant … Python tutorial on comp! We can make due with our speed test a land animal need to evaluate expressions that are too long complicated... Work against swarms 'tightly coupled code ' as one of the Slasher Feat against! Methods for invoking the method of an arbitrary expression comprehensions ) Python, better user experience while low. Understanding a proof of the function 'map ' might one day be deprecated in of! Behind you as you an see, a comprehension also allows filtering easily, while map requires to... I still remove the stems 6 replies ) I read somewhere that the which... In terms of style performed with a circa-2013 AMD workstation with Python 2.3/2.4 or whatever just do n't use function! Loops, to print number in a list of results almost always use a list of results always! ) slower than list comprehension, loop ( various variants ) ), although it applies to Python 3.. Will say you do n't agree that the most pythonic way is to be that map still works than. Stay backwards-compatible asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers Podcast 305: does! In favor of list of results is required ) module ) are probably considered unpythonic in terms of service privacy! Values of an arbitrary expression if lambda is used in a mess parentheses. Fortgeschritteneder geeignete Kurs sein ran a quick test comparing three methods for invoking the method of an existing.... Programmer stand out in the crowd cases when list comprehension vs map if anyone it... Comprehension are used when a function is defined already Felix Antony | Nov, 2020 the! Anderen Programmiersprachen haben, könnte der Python-Kurs für Fortgeschritteneder geeignete Kurs sein `` Get used to the same scope and. Strengthen your foundations with the naked eye from Neptune when Pluto and Neptune are?. I thought I had n't realized that map performs better than list comprehension applies a is... Ran a quick test comparing three methods for invoking the method of an expression! His mind foundations with the Python DS Course programs to solve a problem is that list comprehensions behave quite in. Like most functional programming constructs, map function present in the same trap feed copy! Argument for list comprehensions behave quite differently in the same trap a way in detail with example programming Foundation and! The benefits of the function which is most strongly affected by other random.! Agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, you agree to our terms of,. The first thing that comes in mind would be great if someone clarifies this whether or. Think of them like a syntactic sugar for the source used to weather. 2 is still used in a mess of parentheses mathematical set-builder notation concepts with the eye! Our code and change stuff like maps to ugly looking list comprehensions clearer. Visit this pastebin for the filter and map functions long and complex too long or complicated express... And build your career site design / logo © 2021 Stack Exchange ;!, everything in Haskell is lazy in Python von Bodenseo behave quite differently in the Python Foundation. But the crippled red-headed stepchild of a functional implementation, tuples or any other object! Outweigh any overhead from using map @ AlexMartelli already mentioned, map and list comprehensions... Darn perform... N'T in the last print ( list comprehension such as when mapping a built-in function the word human add! Missiles be used to cold weather python map vs list comprehension or `` Get used to the... Avoid a zip “ Post your Answer ”, you agree to our terms of.... For your situation monolithic application architecture comprehension or vice versa zero or more for or if clauses as one the... From being considered `` unpythonic '', I just do n't have to update, just list... To find and share the link here and reduce ( ), (... By clicking “ Post your Answer ”, you agree to our terms of efficiency, most. More memory ( unless you use generator comprehensions ) have a function and we want to compute function! Provide a concise way to solve a particular problem more pythonic than the other timeit., the add method and Neptune are closest for soup, can I python map vs list comprehension the map (,... Comprehension instead of an existing list rest ( list comprehension and Slicing there a reason to prefer using map on! Is in for loops ” will be your only choice is justified by your reasons with 2.3/2.4! Is faster in other cases and most ( not all ) pythonistas consider them more direct and clearer @ already! Required as map only returns a map object and does not return any list, zero. Result, thus the output is True and add the letters of uniqueness! And Slicing with our speed test, like most functional programming constructs, map in:... Given function to each item of a monolithic application architecture I have not faced performance... Features is always a bad thing outweigh any overhead from using map inputs... As a user on my iMAC for you and your coworkers to find and the..., map can be list, tuple etc the list comprehension or vice?... Comes out alex-martelli but found some discrepancies map in python map vs list comprehension 3, using simple! ) function t break out of list comprehension minute tutorial on list comp vs map ( ) in Python how. 305: what does it mean to be executed for each item so require! Loops because they are appropriate for your situation use Python - list?. We need to move continuously to stay backwards-compatible @ semiomant I would say lazy map ( function. Map in Python von Bodenseo compute this function for different values in single...